1.
Perianal Application of Glyceryl Trinitrate Ointment Versus Tocopherol Acetate Ointment in the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Ruiz-Tovar, J, Llavero, C
Diseases of the colon and rectum. 2022;(3):406-412
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical treatment, including glyceryl trinitrate ointment, represents the first step for the management of chronic anal fissure. However, glyceryl trinitrate ointment is associated with headache and, consequently, a high withdrawal rate of the treatment. OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the topical application of tocopherol acetate ointment on pain relief and chronic anal fissure epithelialization, comparing it with the effect of a standard treatment with glyceryl trinitrate ointment. DESIGN This is a 2-parallel-group, single-center, randomized controlled, intent-to-treat clinical trial. SETTINGS This study was conducted at the Garcilaso Clinic affiliated with Universidad Alfonso X (Madrid, Spain). PATIENTS Patients with chronic anal fissure were selected. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: patients receiving tocopherol acetate ointment and patients receiving glyceryl trinitrate ointment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary end point was quantification of anal pain 8 weeks after beginning the treatment as measured by a Visual Analogue Scale ranging from 0 to 100 mm. The secondary end points were the healing rate (during the treatment period of 8 weeks) and the recurrence rate. RESULTS One hundred sixty consecutive patients were treated, 80 in each group. By 8 weeks after treatment, mean anal pain score declined by 56.2 mm in the glyceryl trinitrate ointment group compared with a mean anal pain score decline of 67.1 mm in the tocopherol acetate ointment group (mean difference, 10.9 mm (95% CI, 4.3-18.6); p = 0.018). Sixteen weeks after finishing the therapy, the recurrence rate was 13.2% in the glyceryl trinitrate ointment group vs 2.9 in the tocopherol acetate ointment group (p = 0.031). LIMITATIONS Limitations of the study include the absence of manometric measurements of the internal anal sphincter before and after the treatments and the use of glyceryl trinitrate ointment as an active comparator, whereas calcium channel blockers are actually the standard treatment. CONCLUSIONS Anal pain was significantly lower in the tocopherol acetate ointment group than in the glyceryl trinitrate ointment group at 8 weeks after treatment. Tocopherol acetate ointment achieved a greater healing rate and a lower recurrence rate 16 weeks after finishing the treatment. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B751. REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT03787030.APLICACIÓN PERIANAL DE POMADA DE TRINITRATO DE GLICERILO FRENTE A LA POMADA DE ACETATO DE TOCOFEROL EN EL TRATAMIENTO DE LA FISURA ANAL CRÓNICA: UN ENSAYO CLÍNICO ALEATORIZADOANTECEDENTESEl tratamiento médico, incluida la pomada de trinitrato de glicerilo, representa el primer paso para el tratamiento de la fisura anal crónica. Sin embargo, la pomada de trinitrato de glicerilo se asocia con cefalea y, en consecuencia, una alta tasa de cancelación del tratamiento.OBJETIVOEl objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar el efecto de la aplicación tópica de pomada de acetato de tocoferol en el alivio del dolor y la epitelización de la fisura anal crónica, comparándolo con el efecto de un tratamiento estándar con pomada de trinitrato de glicerilo.DISEÑO:Ensayo clínico con intención de tratar controlado, aleatorizado, de un solo centro, con dos grupos paralelos.ESCENARIOClínica Garcilaso adscrita a la Universidad Alfonso X (Madrid, España).PACIENTESPacientes con fisura anal crónica.INTERVENCIONESLos pacientes fueron aleatorizados en 2 grupos: pacientes que recibieron pomada de acetato de tocoferol y pacientes que recibieron pomada de trinitrato de glicerilo.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOEl criterio de valoración principal fue la cuantificación del dolor anal 8 semanas después de comenzar el tratamiento, medido por la escala analógica visual que varía de 0 a 100 mm. Los criterios de valoración secundarios fueron la tasa de curación (durante el período de tratamiento de 8 semanas) y la tasa de recurrencia.RESULTADOSSe trataron ciento sesenta pacientes consecutivos, 80 en cada grupo. A las ocho semanas después del tratamiento, la puntuación media de dolor anal se redujo en 56.2 mm en el grupo de pomada de trinitrato de glicerilo en comparación con una disminución de la puntuación de dolor anal medio de 67.1 mm en el grupo de pomada de acetato de tocoferol (diferencia media: 10.9 mm (intervalo de confianza del 95%; 4.3 a 18.6; p = 0.018) Dieciséis semanas después de finalizar la terapia, la tasa de recurrencia fue del 13.2% en el grupo de pomada de trinitrato de glicerilo frente a 2.9 en el grupo de pomada de acetato de tocoferol (p = 0.031).LIMITACIONESAusencia de medidas manométricas del esfínter anal interno antes y después de los tratamientos. Ungüento de trinitrato de glicerilo como comparador activo, mientras que los bloqueadores de los canales de calcio son en realidad el tratamiento estándar de oro.CONCLUSIONESEl dolor anal fue significativamente menor en el grupo de ungüento de acetato de tocoferol que en el grupo de ungüento de trinitrato de glicerilo a las 8 semanas después del tratamiento. La pomada de acetato de tocoferol logró una mayor tasa de curación y una menor tasa de recurrencia 16 semanas después de finalizar el tratamiento. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B751. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco).
2.
Myocardial protective effect of intracoronary administration of nicorandil and alprostadil via targeted perfusion microcatheter in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized controlled trial.
Zhang, W, Dai, J, Zheng, X, Xu, K, Yang, X, Shen, L, Wang, X, Hao, Z, Qiu, X, Jiang, L, et al
Medicine. 2021;(15):e25551
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of nicorandil and alprostadil on myocardial protection in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS In this prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled study, 90 consecutive patients scheduled for elective PCI for de novo coronary lesions were assigned to the nicorandil, alprostadil, and nitroglycerin groups in a 1:1:1 ratio. Drugs were administered intracoronary via a targeted perfusion microcatheter. The primary endpoint was the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) myocardial perfusion frame count (TMPFC). Additionally, the corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC), TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG), and incidence of periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) were assessed. RESULTS Both nicorandil and alprostadil were significantly effective in reducing TMPFC (114.6 ± 33.7 vs 93.4 ± 30.9, P = .016; 114.3 ± 34.3 vs 94.7 ± 33.3, P = .029, respectively). Similar findings were observed in the improvement of cTFC (20.3 ± 10.5 vs 13.5 ± 5.0, P = .003; 20.2 ± 7.4 vs 15.2 ± 5.2, P = .003, respectively) and percentage of TMPG 3 (100% vs 82.8%, P = .052; 83.3% vs 96.7%, P = .196, respectively); whereas, nitroglycerin produced a limited effect on TMPFC (114.4 ± 30.9 vs 112.1 ± 31.9, P = .739), cTFC (19.4 ± 7.2 vs 19.3 ± 7.2, P = .936), and percentage of TMPG 3 (86.7% vs 86.7%, P = 1.000). No significant difference was found in the incidence of PMI (16.7% vs 16.0% vs 27.6%, P = .537), though it was comparatively lower in the nicorandil and alprostadil groups. Furthermore, the intracoronary administration of nicorandil and alprostadil had a mild effect on blood pressure and heart rate. CONCLUSIONS The intracoronary administration of nicorandil and alprostadil via a targeted perfusion microcatheter was more effective in improving myocardial perfusion in patients undergoing elective PCI than nitroglycerin.
3.
Effects of Nicorandil Versus Nitroglycerin on Arterial Oxygenation During Two-Lung Ventilation and One-Lung Ventilation in Patients With Risk Factors for Myocardial Ischemia: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study.
Murakami, C, Kawano, H, Kinoshita, M, Kondo, A, Inoue, M
Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia. 2019;(3):702-709
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the effects of nicorandil and nitroglycerin on arterial oxygenation during two-lung ventilation (TLV) and one-lung ventilation (OLV) in patients with risk factors for myocardial ischemia. DESIGN A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING A tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS Fifty-six patients scheduled for elective video-assisted thoracic surgery were assigned randomly to either the nicorandil group or the nitroglycerin group. INTERVENTIONS Patients in the nicorandil group received a bolus dose of nicorandil, 0.08 mg/kg during induction of anesthesia, followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 0.08 mg/kg/h. Patients in the nitroglycerin group received a continuous infusion of nitroglycerin at a rate of 1 µg/kg/min from the induction of anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Arterial blood gas analysis was performed at the following points: before induction of anesthesia; during TLV; at 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes after the initiation of OLV. PaO2 at TLV (479.7 ± 57.1 v 408.2 ± 70.9 mmHg, p < 0.001); and at 5 minutes (344.8 ± 85.1 v 282.6 ± 85.8 mmHg, p = 0.012), 20 minutes (215.7 ± 103.0 v 158.2 ± 74.5 mmHg, p = 0.027), and 30 minutes (198.8 ± 103.5 v 147.5 ± 64.1 mmHg, p = 0.039) after OLV was significantly higher in the nicorandil group than in the nitroglycerin group. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that oxygenation during TLV and OLV was significantly higher in patients receiving nicorandil than in those receiving nitroglycerin.